W0287
Structure Determination of Visual Rhodopsin. Ronald E.
Stenkamp1,2, Krzysztof Palczewski3,4,5, Takashi
Kumasaka7,8, Tetsuya Hori7,8, Craig A.
Behnke2,6, Hiroyuki Motoshima7, Brian A.
Fox2,6, Isolde Le Trong1,2, David C. Teller2,6,
Tetsuji Okada3, Masaki Yamamoto7, Masashi
Miyano7. 1Dept. of Biological Structure,
2Biomolecular Structure Center, 3Dept. of Ophthalmology,
4Dept. of Pharmacology, 5Dept. of Chemistry,
6Dept. of Biochemistry, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA,
7Structural Biophysical Lab, RIKEN Harima Inst, Hyogo 679-5148,
Japan, 8, Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Inst. of
Technology, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.
Rhodopsin is the membrane protein responsible for the first
step in vision, the absorption of light. It is a G-protein coupled receptor
(GPCR) which responds to a conformational change in its retinal chromophore
brought about by absorption of a photon. Rhodopsin activates its G-protein,
transducin, to initiate a signal transduction cascade that results in a nervous
signal to the brain. To better understand the structural changes involved in
this and other signal transduction processes, we have determined the structure
of ground-state rhodopsin using X-ray crystallographic methods. The emphasis of
the talk in this session with be on technical difficulties faced in growing
crystals, dealing with light-sensitive proteins, solving the twinned crystal
structure, and refining it. Stabilization of the protein with zinc appeared to
be crucial for obtaining crystals. The light sensitivity of the protein, even
at liquid nitrogen temperatures, was dealt with by judicious applications of
black plastic and duct tape to the experimental hutches at the synchrotrons.
MAD techniques were applied to a mercury derivative to solve the structure of
the natural protein. Various techniques were used to handle the merohedrally
twinned crystals, but the best MAD phaseswere obtained from a crystal with a low
twinning fraction. Refinement using detwinned data and refinement using a
twinned model gave comparable results. In addition to the technical issues, the
structure will be discussed. In particular, the seven transmembrane helices
common to all GPCRs will be described with an emphasis on the kinks and bends
that might have physiological significance. The results of comparing the
structure with that of bacteriorhodopsin will be presented, as will structural
details concerning the retinal chromophore.
This work has been supported by the NIH grant EY09339,
Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., Foundation Fighting Blindness, Inc., the
Ruth and Milton Steinback Fund, and the E.K. Bishop Foundation.